HR & Recruiting Software

Best Freelance Platforms in 2026

Twelve freelance platforms for 2026 compared on scale, hiring model, vetting and published fees, from Upwork and Fiverr to Toptal and Contra.

A freelance platform is an online marketplace or network that connects businesses with independent contractors for project-based or ongoing work, and usually handles contracts, payment and dispute resolution. Platforms range from open marketplaces where anyone can post a job and receive bids, to catalogues of pre-packaged services, to curated networks that screen talent before matching it with clients.

The two largest listed marketplaces illustrate the scale of the sector. Upwork reported US$4.0 billion of gross services volume and US$787.8 million of revenue in 2025, and Fiverr reported revenue of US$430.9 million with 3.1 million annual active buyers. Both reported fewer active clients or buyers in 2025 than in 2024 while revenue grew, reflecting a shift toward larger, higher-value engagements.

This list covers twelve freelance platforms operating in November 2026, ranked by published scale, category breadth and fee transparency.

Contents
  1. What is a freelance platform
  2. History and market
  3. Key features to compare
  4. Pricing models
  5. How to choose
  6. Methodology
  7. The list
  8. Comparison table
  9. Alternatives by use case
  10. Recent developments
  11. Frequently asked questions
  12. See also

What is a freelance platform

Freelance platforms let clients find, hire and pay independent workers. Core functions include profiles or portfolios, job posting or service catalogues, messaging, contracts (hourly or fixed-price, often with milestones), payment holding until work is approved, and dispute handling. Platforms earn money through fees on transactions, subscriptions or both: Upwork's marketplace take rate was 18.7% in 2025 and Fiverr's 27.7%.

Freelance platforms overlap with several adjacent categories. Employer of record (EOR) services employ workers formally in other countries rather than contracting them; some platforms, such as Gun.io, add payroll and tax compliance. Staffing agencies and recruitment agencies place workers with a mark-up; Braintrust contrasts its pricing with agency mark-ups. Job boards advertise roles but do not handle contracts or payment. Applicant tracking systems manage hiring pipelines. Curated networks such as Toptal and Catalant sit between marketplaces and consulting firms.

History and market

Upwork's annual report still lists the Elance and oDesk brands among its trademarks. Freelancer.com, operated by ASX-listed Freelancer Limited, reports more than 90 million cumulative registrations. Toptal launched its screened network in 2011 and describes itself as fully remote since 2020.

The sector has since diverged into several models: open bidding (Freelancer.com), catalogue gigs (Fiverr), contests (99designs, now part of Vista), curated networks (Toptal, Arc, Gun.io), commission-free platforms funded by subscriptions (Contra) and enterprise consulting marketplaces (Catalant).

In 2025 the two listed leaders both moved upmarket. Upwork launched Lifted, a subsidiary for enterprise solutions and managed services, in August 2025, while its active clients fell 6% to 785 thousand; Fiverr's active buyers fell 13.6% while revenue rose 10.1%. AI-related work became a growth category, which Upwork's chief executive described in February 2026 as "becoming more material every day".

Key features to compare

Talent vetting

Open marketplaces accept most applicants; curated networks screen heavily. Toptal states that it accepts fewer than 3% of applicants.

Hiring model

Bidding, catalogue purchase, contests and matching each suit different work. Contests suit logos; catalogues suit defined tasks; matching suits specialist roles.

Fees

Compare both sides' fees. Freelancer.com charges employers 3% and freelancers 10%; Contra charges freelancers no commission; Braintrust charges talent no platform fee.

Payment protection

Escrow, milestones and trial periods reduce risk. Toptal and Arc offer trials of up to two weeks.

Category coverage

Generalists such as Upwork cover most skills; Dribbble and 99designs focus on design; Arc and Gun.io on software engineering.

Compliance and payroll

Cross-border contracting raises classification and tax questions; Gun.io handles payroll and tax compliance in more than 100 countries.

Enterprise features

Upwork's Lifted and Catalant serve large organisations with managed services.

Pricing models

Transaction fees are the dominant model. Freelancer.com publishes a 3% employer fee (minimum US$3 on fixed-price) and a 10% freelancer fee (minimum US$5), rising to 15% on recruiter projects. Upwork charges both sides a percentage and Fiverr's take rate is the highest of the listed firms at 27.7%.

Subscriptions: Toptal charges a US$79 monthly subscription when proceeding with matching; Contra Pro costs US$29 a month; Dribbble Pro plans run from US$4 to US$99 a month on annual billing.

Fixed packages: 99designs logo contests cost US$249 to US$1,050.

Rates and placement fees: Arc lists freelance developers at US$15 to over US$110 an hour and charges 20% of salary for full-time hires.

Quote-based: Catalant and Gun.io.

How to choose

Broad range of skills, flexible contracts: Upwork.

Small, well-defined tasks at a known price: Fiverr or PeoplePerHour offers.

Low budget with many bids: Freelancer.com.

Pre-screened senior specialists: Toptal; for developers, Arc or Gun.io.

Logo or brand identity: 99designs contests or Dribbble portfolios.

Freelancers who want to keep their full fee: Contra or Braintrust.

Enterprise consulting projects: Catalant or Upwork's Lifted.

UK businesses: PeoplePerHour.

Methodology

Platforms were included if they operate in November 2026 as a marketplace or network for hiring independent professionals and have a live official website. They were ordered by (1) published scale, using audited revenue and gross services volume for listed companies (Upwork, Fiverr) and company-stated figures for others; (2) breadth of skill categories and hiring models; and (3) fee transparency. Where a platform's own fee pages blocked access during research (Upwork, Fiverr, PeoplePerHour), fee percentages are not stated. Several well-known platforms whose sites could not be reached for verification, such as Malt and Guru, were excluded rather than described from secondary sources. No reviews or ratings were used.

The list

1

Upwork

Best for: Businesses hiring across many skill categories, from one-off tasks to ongoing contracts

Upwork is a work marketplace that connects businesses with independent professionals across development, design, marketing, writing, finance and other categories. It is a Nasdaq-listed company with its principal executive office in Palo Alto, California, and its 10-K lists the earlier Elance and oDesk brands among its trademarks.

Upwork's annual report for 2025 states that its platforms enabled US$4.0 billion of gross services volume (GSV). Total revenue was US$787.8 million, up 2%, of which marketplace revenue was US$682.9 million and enterprise revenue US$104.9 million; the marketplace take rate rose to 18.7% from 18.0%, and the number of active clients fell 6% to 785 thousand from 832 thousand. In August 2025 it launched Lifted, a wholly owned subsidiary providing enterprise solutions and managed services. Management said in February 2026 that AI-related work was becoming more material to the business.

Upwork charges talent a fee as a percentage of their billings and clients a fee as a percentage of payments to talent. Its strengths are scale and category breadth. The downsides are fee layers on both sides, a falling active-client count and the time needed to filter large numbers of proposals.

Key features

  • Open talent marketplace
  • Fees as a percentage of billings
  • Enterprise solutions through Lifted
  • Managed services through Lifted
  • AI-related work categories

Pricing

Free to post jobs; Upwork charges clients a marketplace fee as a percentage of payments and charges talent a service fee as a percentage of billings. Marketplace take rate was 18.7% in 2025. Exact percentages were not verifiable on Upwork's pricing pages, which blocked automated access.

Recent results

2025: GSV US$4.0bn; revenue US$787.8m (+2%); marketplace take rate 18.7%; 785 thousand active clients.

Revenue (FY2025)
US$787.8m
GSV (FY2025)
US$4.0bn
Active clients (2025)
785 thousand
Headquarters
Palo Alto, California, US
Listed on
Nasdaq

Strengths

  • Largest published GSV
  • Covers almost every remote skill category
  • Audited disclosure of take rate and clients
  • Enterprise route through Lifted

Limitations

  • Fees charged to both sides
  • Active clients declining
  • Large proposal volumes to screen
  • Quality varies widely across talent
2

Fiverr

Best for: Small businesses buying defined, fixed-price deliverables

Fiverr is an online marketplace on which freelancers list productised services ("gigs") with fixed packages and prices, and buyers purchase them directly rather than issuing a job post. The company is publicly listed and reports its results quarterly.

For 2025, Fiverr reported revenue of US$430.9 million, up 10.1% from US$391.5 million in 2024. Annual active buyers fell 13.6% to 3.1 million at the end of 2025, while the take rate for the year was 27.7%, up from 27.6%. The figures reflect a strategic shift that management has described toward higher-value work, with fewer but larger buyers.

Fiverr's catalogue model is quick for well-defined tasks such as logo design, video editing or copywriting, and gigs state price and scope before purchase. Its higher take rate than Upwork's reflects fees levied on both buyers and sellers. The catalogue format is less suited to complex, evolving projects, and quality varies considerably across sellers. Fiverr's own fee pages were not accessible for verification at the time of writing, so specific fee percentages are omitted here.

Key features

  • Packaged gigs with fixed scope and price
  • Marketplace and services revenue lines
  • Focus on higher-value work

Pricing

Prices set by sellers per gig. Fiverr charges service fees to buyers and commission to sellers; its 2025 take rate was 27.7%. Fee percentages could not be verified on Fiverr's own pages.

Recent results

2025: revenue US$430.9m (+10.1%); 3.1 million annual active buyers (−13.6%); take rate 27.7%.

Revenue (FY2025)
US$430.9m
Active buyers (end 2025)
3.1 million
Take rate (2025)
27.7%
Listed
Yes

Strengths

  • Prices and scope visible before purchase
  • Fast for small, defined tasks
  • Large catalogue
  • Revenue still growing in 2025

Limitations

  • Highest take rate among listed marketplaces
  • Active buyer count fell in 2025
  • Less suited to complex projects
  • Variable seller quality
3

Toptal

Best for: Companies needing pre-screened senior specialists quickly

Toptal is a curated talent network for software development, design, finance, product and project management. Its timeline records the toptal.com domain becoming Toptal LLC in November 2010 and the launch of the Toptal platform in 2011, and states that in 2020 it became the world's largest fully remote company. As of 2025 it reported more than 3.6 million cumulative talent applications, more than 91,000 talent engagements, a talent network spanning more than 155 countries and more than 35,000 clients served.

Toptal's model differs from open marketplaces: it screens applicants and matches clients with candidates rather than letting clients browse bids. Its FAQ states that it accepts fewer than 3% of the more than 200,000 people who apply each year.

Commercial terms published in its FAQ include a flat monthly subscription fee of US$79 if a client proceeds with talent matching, cancellable at any time; a trial period of up to two weeks at the start of each engagement, during which the client is not billed if unsatisfied; and invoices typically issued twice a month on net-10 terms. Hourly rates are not published and depend on the talent and role. The curation adds cost compared with open marketplaces, and clients have less visibility of the wider talent pool.

Key features

  • Screened talent network (under 3% accepted)
  • Matching by Toptal staff
  • No-risk trial of up to two weeks
  • Twice-monthly invoicing
  • Developers, designers, finance and project experts

Pricing

US$79 monthly subscription if proceeding with matching; talent rates quoted per engagement; trial of up to two weeks without billing if unsatisfied; invoices twice monthly, net 10.

Platform launched
2011
Clients served
35,000+ (company figure)
Talent engagements
91,000+
Acceptance
Fewer than 3% of 200,000+ annual applicants

Strengths

  • Strong pre-screening
  • Trial period before billing
  • Fast matching for specialist roles
  • Fully remote global network

Limitations

  • Hourly rates not published
  • Monthly subscription fee
  • Less choice than open marketplaces
  • Premium positioning raises cost
4

Freelancer.com

Best for: Budget projects and design contests with many competing bids

Freelancer.com is operated by Freelancer Limited, which trades on the Australian Securities Exchange under the ticker FLN and lists its registered office in Grosvenor Place, Sydney. It states that it connects more than 90.6 million registered employers and freelancers in more than 247 countries, regions and territories, a cumulative registration figure rather than an active-user count.

Employers post projects or contests and receive bids. Fees are published in detail: employers pay 3% of the awarded bid or US$3, whichever is greater, on fixed-price projects and 3% of each payment on hourly projects, with no fee for posting or awarding contests. Freelancers pay 10% or US$5, whichever is greater, on fixed-price projects and contests, and 10% on hourly payments, while recruiter projects under the Preferred Freelancer Program carry a 15% fee. Paid membership plans can reduce fees.

The bidding format and low employer fee make Freelancer.com one of the cheaper ways to source simple work, but large bid volumes require screening. The fee page itself contains inconsistent upgrade prices between its tables and FAQ, such as US$10.99 versus US$9.99 for a Featured upgrade.

Key features

  • Project bidding
  • Design and other contests
  • Hourly and fixed-price projects
  • Milestone payments
  • Preferred Freelancer Program
  • Optional project upgrades

Pricing

Employers: 3% or US$3 (greater) on fixed-price; 3% on hourly; contests free to post. Freelancers: 10% or US$5 (greater) on fixed-price and contests; 10% hourly; 15% on recruiter projects. Membership plans reduce fees.

Operator
Freelancer Limited
Listed on
ASX (FLN)
Registered office
Sydney, Australia
Registered users
90.6 million+ (cumulative, company figure)

Strengths

  • Detailed published fee schedule
  • Low employer fee
  • Contests for design work
  • Very large registered base

Limitations

  • Registered-user figure is cumulative, not active
  • High bid volume to screen
  • Inconsistent upgrade prices on fee page
  • Variable quality
5

Contra

Best for: Independent designers and creatives who want to keep their full fee

Contra is a platform for independent creatives, such as designers, developers and video producers, to present portfolios, sell services and digital products, and get paid. It states that it is "always commission-free for all creatives", meaning freelancers do not pay a percentage of project fees to the platform.

Contra's revenue model rests on subscriptions and fixed fees. On the free plan, freelancers pay fees on digital product sales capped at 5% (minimum US$3, maximum US$29), and clients pay a fixed fee of US$15 or US$29 per payment. The Pro plan, at US$29 a month or US$199 a year, removes these fees; third-party payment processing charges still apply.

For freelancers, Contra's commission-free model is its main attraction compared with marketplaces that take 10% or more. For clients, the fixed per-payment fee is predictable. The platform's talent pool is smaller and more design-focused than generalist marketplaces, and its pricing page layout did not make clear how fees apply to payments over US$500.

Key features

  • Commission-free freelancer earnings
  • Portfolio profiles
  • Digital product sales
  • Invoicing and payments
  • Pro subscription removes fees

Pricing

Free plan: no commission on services; digital product fees up to 5% (US$3 minimum, US$29 maximum); clients pay US$15 or US$29 per payment. Pro: US$29 per month or US$199 per year, removes fees. Payment processing extra.

Model
Commission-free for freelancers
Pro plan
US$29 per month or US$199 per year

Strengths

  • No commission on freelancer earnings
  • Predictable fixed client fees
  • Portfolio-first profiles
  • Low-cost Pro plan

Limitations

  • Smaller talent pool
  • Design and creative focus
  • Payment processing fees extra
  • Fee rules for larger payments unclear on pricing page
6

Braintrust

Best for: Companies hiring technical contractors while avoiding agency mark-ups

Braintrust operates a talent marketplace and AI-based hiring products. It states that it has more than 2 million vetted professionals across more than 100 countries. Alongside the marketplace, it sells AIR, an AI interviewing product it says screens candidates 80% faster in more than 16 languages, and Nexus, an automation service.

On pricing, Braintrust states "zero platform fees for talent" on its marketplace, so freelancers keep their full rate, and claims clients can save 30% to 70% compared with traditional staffing agencies; it does not publish a client fee percentage. AIR is priced by volume with no public per-interview price, and for Nexus Braintrust takes 25% of measured savings, with the client keeping 75%. The marketplace claims AI matching within 48 hours.

The zero talent fee is a differentiator, but the absence of a published client fee makes total cost harder to compare with Upwork or Freelancer.com, and the company's product line has broadened beyond freelance hiring into AI interviewing and automation.

Key features

  • Zero fees for talent
  • AI matching within 48 hours
  • AIR AI interviewing
  • Nexus automation service
  • 2 million+ vetted professionals

Pricing

Talent marketplace: zero talent fees; client fee not published. AIR: volume-based, no public price. Nexus: 25% of measured savings.

Talent
2 million+ vetted professionals (company figure)
Countries
100+
Talent fee
0%

Strengths

  • No fees deducted from talent
  • Fast AI matching
  • Claimed savings versus agencies
  • AI interviewing option

Limitations

  • Client fee not published
  • Savings claim is self-reported
  • Product scope extends beyond marketplace
  • Smaller brand recognition than leaders
7

PeoplePerHour

Best for: UK small businesses hiring for marketing, design and development work

PeoplePerHour, operated by People Per Hour Ltd, describes itself as "UK-first", with 60% of its freelancers and clients based in the UK. It cites 3 million rated freelancers and says it is trusted by more than 1 million businesses, and that freelancers have earned US$150 million in total, with top earners making over US$7,000 a month.

Buyers can either post projects and receive proposals or buy fixed-price offers listed by freelancers, similar to Fiverr's gigs. The platform also mentions a partnership with Toptal for hiring vetted freelancers and a global payroll service.

PeoplePerHour's UK focus suits British businesses that want sterling pricing and local time zones. Its home page does not publish platform fees or ownership details, and its fee page could not be reached during research, so fees should be checked before use.

Key features

  • Project posting with proposals
  • Fixed-price offers
  • Rated freelancer profiles
  • Toptal partnership for vetted talent
  • Global payroll service

Pricing

Fees not published on the home page; buyers should check current service fees at sign-up.

Operator
People Per Hour Ltd
Freelancers
3 million rated (company figure)
Businesses
1 million+ (company figure)
UK share
60% of freelancers and clients

Strengths

  • Strong UK focus
  • Both proposals and fixed-price offers
  • Large rated freelancer base
  • Partnership route to vetted talent

Limitations

  • Fees not shown on home page
  • Ownership not disclosed on home page
  • Smaller global reach
  • Quality varies
8

99designs by Vista

Best for: Logo, brand and packaging design through contests

99designs is a graphic design marketplace branded "99designs by Vista", part of the Vista printing and marketing group. Clients can run design contests, in which many designers submit concepts against a brief and the client picks a winner, or hire a designer directly through one-to-one projects.

Logo contest packages are published: Bronze at US$249 with about 30 concepts, Silver at US$399 with about 60, Gold at US$799 with about 90 concepts, top-level designers only and a dedicated manager, and Platinum at US$1,050. All packages include a 100% money-back guarantee and full copyright ownership of the final design.

Contests give clients many options for a fixed price, which suits logos and brand identities. The model is less suited to ongoing work, and it requires designers to work speculatively. One-to-one project fees are not listed on the contest pricing page.

Key features

  • Design contests with fixed packages
  • One-to-one designer projects
  • Money-back guarantee
  • Full copyright transfer
  • Designer levels

Pricing

Logo contests: Bronze US$249; Silver US$399; Gold US$799; Platinum US$1,050 (excluding sales tax). Money-back guarantee. One-to-one project fees not listed on this page.

Owner
Vista
Pricing
Logo contests from US$249

Strengths

  • Many concepts per contest
  • Published fixed prices
  • Money-back guarantee
  • Copyright transfer included

Limitations

  • Design only
  • Speculative work model
  • One-to-one fees not on pricing page
  • Less suited to ongoing work
9

Arc

Best for: Start-ups hiring remote software developers on contract or full time

Arc is a hiring platform for remote software developers and other technical talent. It states that vetted talent have passed its communication and technical assessments.

Arc publishes its client pricing. Freelance hires cost from US$15 to over US$110 per hour depending on skills and experience, and full-time hires are charged at 20% of annual salary. Freelance engagements include a risk-free trial of up to two weeks.

Arc's published rate range and combined freelance and full-time options make it straightforward to budget for developer hiring. It is narrower in scope than generalist marketplaces and does not publish talent pool size or client numbers on its pricing page.

Key features

  • Vetted developers
  • Freelance and full-time hiring
  • Risk-free trial up to two weeks
  • Communication and technical assessments

Pricing

Freelance: US$15 to US$110+ per hour. Full-time: 20% of annual salary. Trial of up to two weeks for freelance hires.

Pricing
Freelance US$15 to US$110+ per hour; full-time 20% of salary
Trial
Up to two weeks

Strengths

  • Published hourly rate range
  • Full-time placement option
  • Trial period
  • Technical vetting

Limitations

  • Developer focus only
  • No published pool size
  • Full-time fee comparable to agencies
  • Rates vary widely
10

Dribbble

Best for: Hiring visual and product designers from portfolio work

Dribbble is a portfolio community for designers that also lets clients find and hire them through project briefs and direct contact. Designers can subscribe to Pro plans that increase visibility and reduce fees.

Pro plans are billed yearly: Lite at US$4 a month, Standard at US$8 a month with a 0% designer platform fee on payouts, and Plus at US$99 a month, which also waives the client platform fee. Fee waivers apply to annual plans only. Plans include credits for responding to project briefs and boosting work.

Dribbble suits clients who want to choose designers by visual portfolio. The pricing page does not state the client platform fee rate on non-Plus plans, and its marketing claims about visibility and earnings are not sourced.

Key features

  • Designer portfolios
  • Project briefs
  • Pro plans with fee waivers
  • Boosted shots
  • Direct hiring

Pricing

Designer Pro plans (billed yearly): Lite US$4 per month; Standard US$8 per month (0% designer platform fee); Plus US$99 per month (0% client platform fee). Fee waivers annual only.

Pro plans
US$4 to US$99 per month, billed yearly

Strengths

  • Visual portfolios for selection
  • Low-cost designer plans
  • Fee waivers available
  • Large design community

Limitations

  • Design only
  • Client fee rate not published for most plans
  • Unsourced marketing claims
  • Less structured contracts than marketplaces
11

Catalant

Best for: Enterprises sourcing independent management consultants for projects

Catalant positions itself as a consulting firm offering "fit-to-purpose" consulting through a model it calls Consulting 2.0, in which independent consultants embed within client teams. It reports more than 40,000 active consultants worldwide, more than 3,900 businesses served in more than 20 countries and consultants from more than 75 countries.

A newer offering, Forward Deployed Experts, pairs domain practitioners with AI engineers to support AI implementation projects.

Catalant is the most enterprise-oriented entry in this list, closer to a consulting firm than a self-service marketplace. It does not publish pricing, and its home page gives inconsistent figures for consultants' average experience (15+ and 20+ years).

Key features

  • Independent management consultants
  • Embedded project teams
  • Forward Deployed Experts for AI
  • Coverage of 20+ client countries

Pricing

Quote-based; not published.

Consultants
40,000+ active (company figure)
Businesses served
3,900+
Pricing
Quote-based

Strengths

  • Senior consulting talent
  • Enterprise focus
  • AI implementation offering
  • Large consultant network

Limitations

  • No published pricing
  • Not self-service
  • Inconsistent experience figures
  • Narrow to consulting work
12

Gun.io

Best for: Engineering teams adding vetted contract developers with managed delivery

Gun.io supplies vetted software professionals and describes itself as an engineering governance layer that handles global sourcing, vetting and delivery management, under the tagline "Elite Talent. Automated Governance. Certain Delivery." Clients receive a shortlist of developers matched to their technology stack and delivery goals.

The site lists developer counts by skill, including 3,950 JavaScript, 3,412 React, 2,820 Python and 1,967 Java developers, and states that it handles payroll and tax compliance in more than 100 countries.

Gun.io is narrower than general marketplaces and aimed at companies wanting managed contract engineering. Pricing is not published on its home page, and its talent pool is in the thousands rather than millions.

Key features

  • Vetted developer shortlists
  • Delivery management
  • Payroll and tax compliance in 100+ countries
  • Stack-based matching

Pricing

Not published on the home page; quote-based.

Payroll coverage
100+ countries
Pricing
Quote-based

Strengths

  • Managed delivery and governance
  • Compliance handled
  • Stack-matched shortlists
  • Published skill counts

Limitations

  • No published pricing
  • Small pool compared with marketplaces
  • Developer-only
  • Less self-service

Comparison table

PlatformModelCategoriesPublished scaleFees (published)Trial / guarantee
UpworkOpen marketplaceAllUS$4.0bn GSV (2025)Both sides pay; take rate 18.7%Not verified
FiverrService catalogueAllUS$430.9m revenue (2025)Take rate 27.7%Not verified
ToptalCurated networkDev, design, finance, PM35,000+ clientsUS$79 monthly subscriptionUp to two weeks
Freelancer.comBidding and contestsAll90.6m+ registrationsEmployer 3%; freelancer 10%Milestones
ContraCommission-freeCreative, devNot statedFreelancer 0%; client US$15–29 per paymentNot stated
BraintrustMarketplace + AI hiringTech2m+ professionalsTalent 0%; client fee not publishedNot stated
PeoplePerHourProposals and offersAll (UK-first)3m freelancersNot published on home pageNot stated
99designsContests and projectsDesignNot statedContests US$249–1,050Money-back guarantee
ArcVetted networkSoftwareNot statedUS$15–110+ per hour; 20% full-timeUp to two weeks
DribbblePortfolio communityDesignNot statedPro US$4–99 per monthNot stated
CatalantConsulting marketplaceManagement consulting40,000+ consultantsQuoteNot stated
Gun.ioVetted networkSoftwareThousands of developersQuoteNot stated

Alternatives by use case

  • Lowest employer fee: Freelancer.com (3%).
  • No commission for freelancers: Contra, Braintrust.
  • Screened talent with trial: Toptal, Arc.
  • Design by contest: 99designs.
  • Design by portfolio: Dribbble.
  • Managed engineering delivery: Gun.io.
  • Enterprise programmes: Upwork's Lifted, Catalant.

Recent developments

  • August 2025: Upwork launched Lifted, a wholly owned subsidiary offering enterprise solutions and managed services.
  • 10 February 2026: Upwork reported 2025 revenue of US$787.8 million and GSV of about US$4.03 billion.
  • 13 February 2026: Upwork filed its 2025 annual report, showing a marketplace take rate of 18.7% and 785 thousand active clients.
  • 18 February 2026: Fiverr reported 2025 revenue of US$430.9 million, up 10.1%, with active buyers down 13.6% to 3.1 million.
  • 2026: Catalant launched Forward Deployed Experts pairing domain specialists with AI engineers.
  • 2026: Braintrust markets AIR, an AI interviewing product, alongside its marketplace.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best freelance platform for beginners?

Open marketplaces such as Upwork, Fiverr, Freelancer.com and PeoplePerHour accept most applicants and cover many skill categories, which makes them the usual starting point. Curated networks such as Toptal and Arc screen applicants heavily; Toptal says it accepts fewer than 3% of applicants, so they suit experienced professionals.

Which freelance platform has the lowest fees?

For freelancers, Contra charges no commission on services and Braintrust states zero platform fees for talent. Freelancer.com publishes a 10% freelancer fee and a 3% employer fee. Upwork and Fiverr charge both sides; their overall take rates in 2025 were 18.7% and 27.7% respectively.

Is Upwork bigger than Fiverr?

By revenue, yes. Upwork reported 2025 revenue of US$787.8 million and gross services volume of US$4.0 billion, while Fiverr reported revenue of US$430.9 million. Fiverr reported 3.1 million active buyers and Upwork 785 thousand active clients, metrics that are defined differently and not directly comparable.

How do freelance platforms protect payments?

Most hold client funds until work is approved, using escrow or milestones, and offer dispute resolution. Some add trial periods: Toptal and Arc let clients end an engagement within up to two weeks without being billed. 99designs offers a money-back guarantee on contests.

What is the difference between Toptal and Upwork?

Upwork is an open marketplace where clients post jobs and choose from proposals. Toptal is a curated network that screens applicants and matches clients with talent, charging a US$79 monthly subscription when matching proceeds and offering a trial of up to two weeks. Toptal suits specialist roles; Upwork offers wider choice.

Are freelancers on these platforms employees?

No. Freelancers are generally independent contractors, and the client is responsible for ensuring the relationship is correctly classified under local law. Companies that need to employ someone abroad formally use an employer of record instead. Some platforms, such as Gun.io, also handle payroll and tax compliance.

See also

Should your company be on this list?

Submit your logo, description, image and link for review. Approved listings appear in the Featured section above.

Add your company

Is your company missing from a list?

Send your logo, description and link. Editors review every submission, and approved listings are clearly labelled.

Add your company