AI Tools

Best AI Video Generators in 2026

Ten AI video generators compared for 2026: text-to-video models, avatar presenters and editors, with published plan prices and model access.

An AI video generator is software that produces moving images from a text prompt, a still image or a script, using generative models trained on video. Two broad families exist. Generative-model tools such as Google Veo, Runway and Kling synthesise new footage frame by frame, while avatar tools such as Synthesia and HeyGen render a digital presenter reading a script, mainly for training, marketing and localisation videos.

This list covers ten products that were commercially available in November 2026. The field changed sharply during the year: OpenAI closed the Sora web and mobile app on 26 April 2026 and the Sora API on 24 September 2026, and several platforms now resell third-party models alongside their own, so one subscription can give access to Veo, Kling and Seedance models in the same interface.

Contents
  1. Types of AI video generator
  2. The closure of Sora
  3. Methodology
  4. The list
  5. Comparison table
  6. Credits and usage limits
  7. Frequently asked questions
  8. See also

Types of AI video generator

Foundation-model products are built around a video model developed by the same company. Google's Veo 3.1 generates video with native audio, including sound effects and dialogue, at 1080p and 4K. Runway, Kling and Luma follow the same pattern with their own models.

Aggregators and editors wrap several models in an editing interface. Luma's pricing page lists models from ByteDance (Seedance), Kuaishou (Kling), Google (Veo) and MiniMax alongside its own Ray models, and Invideo's plans are defined by which Seedance tiers they unlock.

Avatar platforms turn a written script into a presenter-led video and add translation and dubbing. Their output is constrained, but they are designed for repeatable corporate formats rather than cinematic footage.

The closure of Sora

OpenAI's Sora was one of the most widely covered text-to-video models after its consumer app launched in 2025. In March 2026 OpenAI set a two-stage shutdown, closing the app and web version on 26 April 2026 and the API on 24 September 2026, and advised users to export their libraries before those dates. It is therefore not included in this list.

Methodology

Products were included if they were on sale to the public in November 2026, generate video with AI rather than only editing existing footage, and publish either a pricing page or an official model page. Prices were taken from each vendor's own pricing page in November 2026 and are in US dollars, excluding tax; credit-based plans convert credits to video at rates that vary by model, resolution and duration, so credits are not directly comparable between vendors.

The order is an editorial judgement weighing the vendor's own model capability, breadth of access (consumer app, API, enterprise), transparency of pricing and fitness for a defined use case. No hands-on benchmark, user rating or market-share figure was used, and none is implied by the ranking.

The list

1

Google Veo

Best for: Text-to-video with synchronised audio inside the Google ecosystem

Veo is the video generation model family developed by Google DeepMind. Google describes Veo 3.1 as its leading video model; it generates sound effects, ambient noise and dialogue natively and outputs at 1080p and 4K, and clips can be lengthened with scene extension. Veo is reached through several Google products: the Gemini app, the Flow filmmaking tool, Google Vids, Google AI Studio and the Gemini API for developers. On the consumer side, Google's subscription page lists Flow access for free users on a limited basis, 200 Flow credits on Google AI Plus at US$4.99 a month and 1,000 credits on Google AI Pro at US$19.99 a month, the latter with a limited trial of Veo 3.1 Lite. Veo models are also licensed to third-party platforms such as Luma.

Developer
Google DeepMind
Current model
Veo 3.1
Output resolution
1080p and 4K
Consumer access
Gemini app, Flow (AI Plus US$4.99/mo, AI Pro US$19.99/mo)

Strengths

  • Native audio generation, including dialogue
  • Available both to consumers and to developers through the Gemini API

Limitations

  • Google's own page notes that short spoken audio segments are still being refined
  • Model availability per subscription tier is not itemised on the plans page
2

Runway

Best for: Film, advertising and design teams that need generation and editing in one tool

Runway develops its own generative video models and sells them through a browser-based creative suite. Its pricing page lists Gen-4.5 and the Aleph 2.0 video-editing model, together with third-party models including Kling 4.0 and Seedance 2.0 Pro. The free tier gives a one-time grant of 125 credits. Paid plans are Standard at US$15 a month billed monthly (US$12 annually) with 625 credits, Pro at US$35 (US$28) with 2,250 credits, and Max at US$95 (US$76) with 9,500 credits and early access to new models. The company lists offices in New York, San Francisco, Seattle, London, Paris, Tel Aviv and Tokyo. Runway moved its primary domain from runwayml.com to runway.com, and the old address now redirects.

Own models
Gen-4.5, Aleph 2.0
Pricing
Free (125 one-time credits); Standard US$15/mo; Pro US$35/mo; Max US$95/mo (monthly billing)
Offices
New York, San Francisco, Seattle, London, Paris, Tel Aviv, Tokyo

Strengths

  • Combines generation with model-based editing of existing footage
  • Clearly tiered credit allowances on a public pricing page

Limitations

  • Free credits are a one-time grant, not monthly
  • The full model list sits behind a "view more" link rather than being published per plan
3

Kling AI

Best for: Users who want a high-volume model available both directly and through third-party tools

Kling AI is the video generation product of Kuaishou Technology, the operator of the Kuaishou short-video app. Its website promotes Kling 4.0 as the current model. Kuaishou reports Kling as a separate revenue line: in its results for the second quarter of 2026, released on 19 August 2026, the company said Kling AI generated revenue of over RMB850 million in the quarter, more than 200% higher than a year earlier. Kling models are also resold by other tools in this list; Runway, Luma and Adobe Firefly all list Kling models in their plans. Kling's own consumer membership prices were not displayed on the pages accessible for this review.

Operator
Kuaishou Technology
Current model
Kling 4.0
Revenue (Q2 2026)
Over RMB850 million (Kuaishou results, 19 August 2026)

Strengths

  • Only product in the list whose revenue is disclosed in its parent company's quarterly results
  • Widely licensed, so it can be used inside other editors

Limitations

  • Consumer plan pricing could not be confirmed from the official site
  • Operator identity is not stated on the product homepage
4

Luma Dream Machine

Best for: Comparing several frontier video models under one subscription

Luma AI develops the Ray family of video models and offers them in its Dream Machine creative app alongside an unusually long list of third-party models. Its pricing page lists Ray3.2 and Ray3.14 next to Seedance, Kling 4.0, Veo 3.1 and MiniMax H3, plus image, audio and lip-sync models. Individual plans are Plus at US$30 a month with 10,000 credits, Pro at US$90 with 40,000 credits and Ultra at US$300 with 150,000 credits; annual billing lowers these to US$25, US$75 and US$250 a month. All individual plans include commercial use. Team and Enterprise plans add shared credits, SSO and custom fine-tuning, with prices available from sales.

Own models
Ray3.2, Ray3.14
Pricing
Plus US$30/mo; Pro US$90/mo; Ultra US$300/mo; Team and Enterprise quote-based

Strengths

  • Access to models from several developers in one credit pool
  • Commercial use included from the entry paid plan

Limitations

  • No free tier listed on the pricing page
  • Entry price is higher than Runway or Pika
5

Synthesia

Best for: Learning and development teams producing localised training videos

Synthesia generates presenter-led videos from a script using stock or custom AI avatars, and is aimed at corporate training, onboarding and internal communication. The company says it was founded in 2017 and gives its address as London. The pricing page lists a Basic plan at US$0 with 10 minutes a month and 9 avatars; Starter at US$19 a month (US$14 billed yearly) with 125+ avatars; Pro at US$89 a month (US$59 billed yearly) with 180+ avatars; and a custom-priced Enterprise plan with 240+ stock avatars and unlimited video minutes. The comparison table lists 140+ languages and voices, while dubbing output covers 70+ languages below Enterprise.

Founded
2017
Address
London, United Kingdom
Pricing
Basic free; Starter US$19/mo; Pro US$89/mo; Enterprise quote-based

Strengths

  • Free plan with a monthly minute allowance
  • Broad language and voice coverage for translation

Limitations

  • Does not generate open-ended cinematic footage
  • Dubbing languages on self-serve plans are fewer than the headline language count
6

HeyGen

Best for: Marketing teams translating and localising spokesperson video

HeyGen produces avatar-presented videos and translates existing video into other languages with lip-synced voice. The company says its product is used by over 40 million people and by 85% of the Fortune 100, and names Joshua Xu, a former Snap engineer, as its founder; it lists offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Palo Alto and Toronto. The free plan allows three watermarked videos a month of up to one minute. Creator costs US$29 a month with 600 credits and 30-minute videos, Pro starts at US$49 with 1,000 credits, and Business costs US$149 a month plus US$20 per additional seat, with 60-minute videos. Paid plans list 175+ languages and dialects.

Founder
Joshua Xu
Pricing
Free; Creator US$29/mo; Pro from US$49/mo; Business US$149/mo + US$20/seat; Enterprise quote-based
Languages
175+ on paid plans

Strengths

  • Free tier available for testing
  • Long maximum video length on paid plans

Limitations

  • Free videos are watermarked
  • Pro plan price scales steeply with credit volume
7

Adobe Firefly

Best for: Creative Cloud users who need generated clips inside an existing Adobe workflow

Adobe Firefly is Adobe's generative AI application, covering image, video and audio generation and integrated with Creative Cloud. Plans are sold by generative credits: Firefly Standard at US$9.99 a month with 2,000 credits, Firefly Pro at US$19.99 with 4,000, and Firefly Pro Plus at US$49.99 with 10,000, with introductory discounts running at the time of review. Adobe says plans give access to models from Adobe, Google, OpenAI and other providers; Pro Plus includes unlimited generations on selected video models, including Kling 2.5 Turbo, for the first year. The team-oriented Firefly Premium at US$199.99 per licence a month includes unlimited use of the Firefly Video Model.

Developer
Adobe
Pricing
Free; Standard US$9.99/mo; Pro US$19.99/mo; Pro Plus US$49.99/mo; Premium US$199.99/licence/mo

Strengths

  • Low entry price for a paid plan
  • Integrates with Adobe's editing applications

Limitations

  • The plans page does not name which video models each lower tier includes
  • Unlimited video generation on Pro Plus is limited to the first year
8

Pika

Best for: Individual creators making short social-media clips

Pika is a consumer and creator-oriented AI video generator used mainly for short social clips and effects. Its pricing is credit-based: a free tier with no monthly credits (credit packs only), Starter at US$10 a month with 600 credits, Creator at US$35 with 2,600 credits, and Fancy from US$95 with 8,550 credits and up. Annual billing reduces these to US$8, US$28 and US$76 a month, and an Enterprise tier is priced on request.

Compared with the model developers above, Pika's public material concentrates on creative effects and quick turnaround rather than long-form footage or enterprise controls.

Pricing
Free (credit packs only); Starter US$10/mo; Creator US$35/mo; Fancy from US$95/mo; Enterprise quote-based

Strengths

  • Lowest monthly-billed paid plan among the generators listed
  • Simple credit tiers

Limitations

  • Free tier includes no monthly credits
  • Little published information on model versions or enterprise features
9

Invideo AI

Best for: Explainer and social videos assembled from a single prompt

Invideo AI turns a prompt into an edited video with script, voice-over and footage, combining generated clips with a stock library. Plans are per seat: Basic at US$9 a month billed monthly with 190 credits, Pro at US$30 with 1,000 credits and Ultra at US$80 with 3,000 credits, with annual billing roughly halving the price. The pricing page ties plan level to model access: Basic is limited to Seedance 2.0 Fast and Mini, while Pro and Ultra unlock all models, including Seedance 2.5 at 1080p. Plans also include premium stock footage allowances and up to 800 GB of storage.

Pricing
Basic US$9/seat/mo; Pro US$30/seat/mo; Ultra US$80/seat/mo (monthly billing)

Strengths

  • Combines generation, stock media and editing
  • Team seats included on every plan

Limitations

  • Relies on third-party video models rather than its own
  • Pricing page shows inconsistent figures for the Basic annual price
10

Hailuo AI

Best for: Developers and creators who want an open-weight video model

Hailuo AI is the video generation product of MiniMax, a Chinese AI developer whose investor-relations site lists Hailuo video among its products. The Hailuo site promotes the MiniMax H3 model as its current release, and MiniMax describes H3 as an open-weight multimodal model. The same model is offered through third-party platforms; Luma lists MiniMax H3 and H3 Max among its video models. Hailuo's subscription page did not display plan prices when accessed for this review, so pricing is omitted.

Operator
MiniMax
Current model
MiniMax H3
Pricing
Not published on the accessible subscription page

Strengths

  • Open-weight model allows self-hosting and research use
  • Available both directly and through other platforms

Limitations

  • Plan prices could not be verified
  • Less English-language documentation than US and UK vendors

Comparison table

ProductTypeOwn modelFree tierLowest paid plan (monthly billing)
Google VeoFoundation modelVeo 3.1Limited Flow accessUS$4.99 (Google AI Plus)
RunwayFoundation model and editorGen-4.5, Aleph 2.0125 one-time creditsUS$15
Kling AIFoundation modelKling 4.0Not verifiedNot verified
Luma Dream MachineFoundation model and aggregatorRay3.2NoUS$30
SynthesiaAvatarProprietary avatars10 min/monthUS$19
HeyGenAvatarProprietary avatars3 videos/monthUS$29
Adobe FireflySuiteFirefly Video ModelLimited dailyUS$9.99
PikaConsumer generatorNot statedCredit packs onlyUS$10
Invideo AIEditorNo (third-party)Not listedUS$9 per seat
Hailuo AIFoundation modelMiniMax H3Not verifiedNot verified

Credits and usage limits

Nearly every vendor in this list sells credits rather than minutes, and the credit cost of a clip rises with resolution, duration and the model chosen. Runway, Luma, Pika, HeyGen and Invideo all state that consumption varies by model. Synthesia is the exception, quoting video minutes per plan. When comparing plans, the useful figure is the number of finished clips at the required resolution, which some vendors, such as Invideo, publish as an example count.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI video generator in 2026?

It depends on the output needed. For generating new footage with sound, Google's Veo 3.1 and Runway's Gen-4.5 are the most fully documented models from their developers. For presenter-led training or marketing videos, avatar platforms such as Synthesia and HeyGen are built for that format. Aggregators like Luma let users switch between several models on one plan.

Is there a free AI video generator?

Several vendors offer limited free use. Synthesia's Basic plan includes 10 minutes of video a month, HeyGen allows three watermarked videos a month, Runway grants 125 one-time credits, Adobe Firefly offers limited daily generations, and Google gives limited Flow access without a paid plan. Free output is usually watermarked or restricted in resolution and length.

What happened to OpenAI Sora?

OpenAI shut Sora down in two stages announced in March 2026. The Sora web and mobile app closed on 26 April 2026 and the Sora API on 24 September 2026. Users were told to export their videos and images before those dates, after which stored data would be deleted.

Can AI-generated videos be used commercially?

Commercial rights depend on the plan, not just the tool. Luma states that all of its individual paid plans include commercial use, and most vendors restrict free-tier output through watermarks or licence terms. Users should check each vendor's terms of service for ownership of outputs, especially when third-party models are accessed through an aggregator.

What is the difference between an AI video generator and an AI avatar tool?

A general video generator synthesises new scenes from a prompt or image, such as landscapes, products or characters in motion. An avatar tool produces a talking presenter who reads a supplied script, often in many languages. Avatar tools are more predictable and suit training content, while general generators offer more creative range but less control.

See also

Categories: AI Tools All lists

Should your company be on this list?

Submit your logo, description, image and link for review. Approved listings appear in the Featured section above.

Add your company

Is your company missing from a list?

Send your logo, description and link. Editors review every submission, and approved listings are clearly labelled.

Add your company